Reviewers

该评审报告应全面批判的提交和包括远比一些简短的句子了。Hindawi出版不需要报告特定的结构，但是，建议格式为：

• 摘要
• Major issues
• Minor issues

We encourage reviewers to help authors improve their manuscript. The report should give constructive analysis to authors, particularly where revisions are recommended. Where reviewers do not wish authors to see certain comments, these can be added to the confidential comments to the Academic Editor.

While expectations vary by discipline, some core aspects that should be critiqued by reviewers may include:

• 是研究问题是否有效？
• Is the sample size sufficient?
• 有必要的伦理批准和/或同意吗and was the research ethical?
• Are the methods and study design appropriate for answering the research question?
• 不要实验有适当的控制？
• Is the reporting of the methods, including any equipment and materials, sufficiently detailed that the research might be reproduced?
• Are any statistical tests used appropriate and correctly reported?
• Are the figures and tables clear and do they accurately represent the results?
• Has previous research by the authors and others been discussed and have those results been compared to the current results?
• Are there any inappropriate citations, for example, not supporting the claim being made or too many citations to the authors' own articles?
• Do the results support the conclusions?
• Are limitations of the research acknowledged?
• Is the abstract an accurate summary of the research and results, without spin?
• Is the language clear and understandable?

To help authors receive timely reviews, reviewer reports should be submitted via the manuscript tracking system on or before the agreed deadline. Reviewers should contact Hindawi if they are unable to meet the deadline so an alternative date can be arranged.

We encourage reviewers to focus their reports on objectively critiquing the scientific aspects of the submission, including the soundness of the methodology and whether the conclusions can be supported by the results. Comments may also be given on novelty and the potential impact of the work. At the end of their review, we ask reviewers to recommend one of the following actions:

• 发布未改变
• 考虑较小的变动后
• Consider after Major Changes
• Reject: Manuscript is flawed or not sufficiently novel

However, it is important to note that the overall decision will be made by the Academic Editor.

Hindawi does not mandate the use of reporting guidelines by authors, however, we encourage reviewers to use relevant reporting guidelines to help assess the submission. The赤道Network provides clinical guidelines, whileFAIRsharinglist clinical and general science guidelines. We particularly encourage the use of:

• CONSORTfor randomized controlled trials
• TRENDfor non-randomized trials
• PRISMAfor systematic review and meta-analyses
• CARE对于病例报告
• STROBEfor observational studies
• STREGA遗传相关性研究
• SRQRfor qualitative studies
• STARDfor diagnostic accuracy studies
• ARRIVE动物实验

Hindawi出版是出版道德规范（COPE）委员会的成员。阅读COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewersfor information on best practice in peer review.

Reviewers should raise any concerns about publication ethics to the科研诚信团队.

Manuscripts under peer review should be strictly confidential. Reviewers must not share manuscripts or discuss their content with anyone outside the peer review process.

评审会，根据要求，从他们的研究小组相信，该手稿的机密保持的同事请教。审稿人首先应该联系Hindawi出版或学术编辑处理稿件，并在“评论主编”他们的报告的部分注意同事（一个或多个）的名称。

Reviewers will be anonymous to the authors unless they choose to disclose their identity by signing the review report.

审稿人应拒绝时，他们审查提交：

• Have a recent publication or current submission with any author
• Share or have recently shared an affiliation with any author
• Collaborate or have recently collaborated with any author
• 有密切的个人关系对任何作者
• Have a financial interest in the subject of the work
• Feel unable to be objective

Reviewers must declare any remaining interests in the ‘Confidential’ section of the review form, which will be considered by the editor.

Reviewers must declare if they have previously discussed the manuscript with the authors.

Reviewers are encouraged to comment on authors’ declared conflicts of interest. If there are concerns that authors have not fully disclosed financial, institutional, commercial, personal, ideological, or academic interests, this should be raised in the reviewer report.

我们赞赏申请加入我们的审稿人社区。我们的学术编辑选择的手稿逐稿的基础上审阅。在每一种情况下，他们邀请最合适的科学家从他们自己的网络，或通过我们的推荐列表。为了确保我们有您了最新的联系方式，有兴趣的评审应用户帐户注册。