积水的努克的运河ometriosis: Right-Side Dominance Confirmed by Literature Review and Statistical Analysis

Abstract

Introduction. The canal of Nuck is an embryological remnant of the peritoneal pouch that extends into the labium majus of women. Hydrocele is the most common presentation, but only a small number of cases are reported in association with endometriosis.Case Presentation. The patient is a 45-year-old woman who presented with left inguinal mass with persistent pain. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a 30 mm cystic mass, and a hydrocele of the canal of Nuck (HCN) was suspected. The excised mass was a cyst containing yellow-tan serous fluid, and the cyst wall was lined by mesothelium. The morphology was consistent with conventional HCN. However, since several foci of endometrial-like epithelium and stroma were identified beneath the mesothelium, the mass was diagnosed with HCN with endometriosis (EM-HCN).Discussion. Right-side dominance of EM-HCN is suggested by several authors, but a thorough review has never been performed. For the first time, we reviewed the literature and statistically confirmed that EM-HCNs dominantly occur on the right side compared to those without endometriosis. We consider that this supports the theory that endometriosis derives from retrograde menstruation of endometrial tissue through fallopian tubes. When endometriosis is discovered in HCN, the clinician should be aware of the possibility of pelvic endometriosis.

1. Introduction

Embryologically, in female, the parietal peritoneum extends into the inguinal canal and the labium majus accompanying the round ligament of the uterus; however, it usually obliterates completely within the first year of life. When it fails to obliterate, the structure is called the canal of Nuck, named after a Dutch anatomist Anton Nuck who described the first case in 1691 [1]. The canal of Nuck is an uncommon anomaly which is analogous to patent processus vaginalis in male, and it can cause a hydrocele or an indirect inguinal hernia depending on the diameter of the canal. Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck (HCN) is occasionally confused with inguinal hernia as they both typically present as a painless groin mass. However, unlike inguinal hernia, HCN does not contain bowel or fat; Doppler ultrasonography is considered useful for the diagnosis [2].

Endometriosis is a common gynecologic disorder accounting for 6 to 10% of the general female population, and it is characterized by the presence of endometrial-like epithelium and stroma outside the endometrium. The peritoneum and pelvic organs are well-known sites of endometriosis being the cause of chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and infertility, yet distant locations such as pleura can also be affected potentially triggering catamenial pneumothorax [3].

Rarely, endometriosis is discovered in HCN. Several authors have suggested that HCN with endometriosis (EM-HCN) tends to occur more on the right side and presents with pain compared to those without endometriosis (non-EM-HCN) [4–8]. However, a thorough review has never been performed. Here, we report a case of EM-HCN with a review of the literature and aim to prove the right-side dominance by statistical analysis for the first time.

2. Case Presentation

The patient is a 45-year-old woman without any particular medical history. She noticed a left inguinal mass a week before and visited our hospital because of persistent pain. The patient did not recall any episode of trauma. On examination, the mass was firm, smooth, and irreducible. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) displayed a 30 mm cystic mass in the subcutis of the left inguinal region which does not communicate with the peritoneum (Figures1(a)–1(c)). Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck was suspected. The mass was excised and submitted for a pathological study.

宏观上,它是一个与dar囊肿k brown surface containing yellow-tan serous fluid (Figure2(a)). The cyst wall was smooth and thin, and no solid component was identified. Microscopically, the cyst was lined by single-layered flat cells which were considered as mesothelium; it was a typical morphology of HCN. However, a few glands of columnar cells accompanied by round monotonous cells that were considered as endometrial tissue were also identified beneath the mesothelium in several areas as well as hemorrhage and hemosiderin-laden macrophages (Figures2(b)–2(d)).

In immunohistochemistry, single-layered flat cells were positive for calretinin, podoplanin, and Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT-1) (Figures3(a)–3(c)). Columnar cells were positive for estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) (Figures3(d)and3(e)). Round monotonous cells were positive for ER, PR, CD10, and WT-1 (Figures3(d)–3(f)and3(a)). These results were consistent with mesothelium and endometrial tissue, respectively.

Based on the histology and the result of immunohistochemistry, the mass was diagnosed with EM-HCN. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged two days after the operation. No sign of recurrence was observed in the follow-up after three weeks.

3. Review of the Literature and Statistical Analysis

We reviewed English-reported cases of both EM-HCN and non-EM-HCN that were published in 2000 or later [6–32]. Only cases of reproductive age (age: 15-49) reported with definite pathological diagnosis were included. Cases complicated with infection or neoplasm were excluded. The reviewed cases are summarized in Table1.

Out of 25 cases of EM-HCN including our case (age: 20-46, mean: 34.6), 21 cases (84%) occurred on the right side. In contrast, out of 28 cases of non-EM-HCN (age: 17-45, mean: 34.0), only 16 cases (57%) occurred on the right side (Table2). Using Fisher’s exact test, we discovered that EM-HCN dominantly occurred on the right side compared to non-EM-HCN with a significant difference (84% vs. 57%, ).The analysis was performed with EZR (Saitama Medical Centre, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan) [33].

4. Discussion

Right-side dominance of the inguinal endometriosis has been suggested by several authors reporting that 86-90% occurred on the right side [4,5]. Nevertheless, statistical analysis has never been attempted.

So far, two theories are proposed as the pathogenesis of endometriosis: one is the metaplasia of coelomic epithelium and the other is the retrograde menstruation of endometrial tissue through fallopian tubes [3]. The former theory cannot logically explain the dominance of the right-sided EM-HCN; however, based on the latter theory, Candiani et al. introduced an idea that the clockwise flow of the ascites makes the right side more susceptible to endometrial implants and left side protected by the sigmoid colon [5]. This idea is adopted from catamenial pneumothorax in which 87.5 to 100% of the cases are reported on the right side [34].

Regarding the pain, either discomfort or pain was reported in 12 cases (48%) of EM-HCN and 7 cases (25%) of non-EM-HCN. EM-HCNs tend to present with pain more as it has been suggested in the past. However, we could not analyze these cases as the status of pain was not reported in 15 cases (33%).

Among EM-HCNs, catamenial symptom such as pain and change of size were present in 7 cases (28%), absent in 16 cases (64%), and not reported in 2 cases (8%). Interestingly, catamenial symptom was not reported in any of the non-EM-HCN indicating that the presence of catamenial symptom may help a clinician suspect the complication of endometriosis.

Also, MRI is considered useful in detecting endometriosis in the ovary and HCN typically showing high signal intensity on T1-weighted image and shading sign on T2-weighted image [7]. Nevertheless, in our case, MRI showed non-EM-HCN pattern, reflecting the nature of the fluid, and could not detect endometriosis preoperatively. The sensitivity of MRI is also discussed by some authors highlighting the significance of pathological examination [8,28].

In addition, out of 25 cases of EM-HCN, pelvic endometriosis was discovered in 10 cases (40%). Thus, it is important to inform the clinician the possibility of pelvic endometriosis when EM-HCN is revealed pathologically. This is especially important because patients with HCN are frequently referred to a general surgeon and not a gynecologist after initially being diagnosed with hernia.

5. Conclusion

We reported a rare case of EM-HCN with a review of the literature and statistically confirmed that EM-HCNs dominantly occur on the right side compared to non-EM-HCNs for the first time. This supports the theory that endometriosis derives from retrograde menstruation of endometrial tissue through fallopian tubes.

子宫内膜异位在HCN可以确定没有lly even if it is absent in MRI. When endometriosis is discovered in HCN, the clinician should be aware of the possibility of pelvic endometriosis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

1. A. Nuck,Adenographia curiosa et uteri foeminei anatome nova, Lugduni Batavorum (Leiden), Apud Jordanum Luchtmans, 1691.
2. Q. H. B. Heng, D. Chinchure, and R. M. Singaporewalla, “Clinics in diagnostic imaging (183),”Singapore Medical Journal, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 12–16, 2018.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
3. L. C. Giudice and L. C. Kao, “Endometriosis,”The Lancet, vol. 364, no. 9447, pp. 1789–1799, 2004.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
4. I. Clausen and K. T. Nielsen, “Endometriosis in the groin,”International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 469–471, 1987.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
5. G. B. Candiani, P. Vercellini, L. Fedele, N. Vendola, S. Carinelli, and V. Scaglione, “Inguinal endometriosis: pathogenetic and clinical implications,”Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 191–194, 1991.View at:Google Scholar
6. A. Kirkpatrick, C. M. Reed, L. T. Bui-Mansfield, M. J. Russell, and W. Whitford, “Radiologic-pathologic conference of Brooke Army Medical Center: endometriosis of the canal of Nuck,”AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 186, no. 1, pp. 56-57, 2006.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
7. M. Gaeta, F. Minutoli, A. Mileto et al., “Nuck canal endometriosis: MR imaging findings and clinical features,”Abdominal Imaging, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 737–741, 2010.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
8. H. Niitsu, H. Tsumura, T. Kanehiro, H. Yamaoka, H. Taogoshi, and N. Murao, “Clinical characteristics and surgical treatment for inguinal endometriosis in young women of reproductive age,”Digestive Surgery, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 166–172, 2019.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
9. C. F. Yen, C. J. Wang, S. L. Lin, P. C. Chang, C. L. Lee, and Y. K. Soong, “Laparoscopic closure of patent canal of Nuck for female indirect inguinal hernia,”The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 143–146, 2001.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
10. P. C. Khanna, T. Ponsky, B. Zagol, J. R. Lukish, and B. M. Markle, “Sonographic appearance of canal of Nuck hydrocele,”Pediatric Radiology, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 603–606, 2007.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
11. A. Ozel, O. Kirdar, A. M. Halefoglu et al., “Cysts of the canal of Nuck: ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings,”Journal of Ultrasound, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 125–127, 2009.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
12. A. Caviezel, X. Montet, J. Schwartz, J. F. Egger, and C. E. Iselin, “Female hydrocele: the cyst of Nuck,”Urologia Internationalis, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 242–245, 2009.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
13. R. Jagdale, S. Agrawal, S. Chhabra, and S. Y. Jewan, “Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck: value of radiological diagnosis,”Journal of Radiology Case Reports, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 18–22, 2012.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
14. j .布m . Gillam的积水和i . m .教皇。the canal of Nuck--an old problem revisited,”Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 517–519, 2013.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
15. R. Kono, H. Terasaki, N. Murakami, M. Tanaka, J. Takeda, and T. Abe, “Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck: a case report with magnetic resonance hydrography findings,”Surgical Case Reports, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 86, 2015.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
16. J. Heer, R. McPheeters, A. E. Atwell, P. Aguiniga, and J. Blake, “Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck,”The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 786-787, 2015.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
17. V. Patnam, R. Narayanan, and A. Kudva, “A cautionary approach to adult female groin swelling: hydrocoele of the canal of Nuck with a review of the literature,”BMJ Case Reports, vol. 2016, article bcr2015212547, 2016.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
18. A. F. Ferreira, J. P. Marques, and F. Falcão, “Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck presenting as a sausage-shaped mass,”BMJ Case Reports, vol. 2017, article bcr2017221024, 2017.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
19. J. Aalberg, W. Simpson, and C. Divino, “Canal of Nuck hydrocele: diagnosis and treatment of a rare inguinal pathology,”The American Surgeon, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. e178–e180, 2018.View at:Google Scholar
20. N. Chihara, N. Taniai, H. Suzuki, R. Nakata, M. Shioda, and H. Yoshida, “Use of a novel open posterior wall technique for laparoscopic excision of hydrocele of the canal of Nuck in an adult female: case report,”Journal of Nippon Medical School, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 345–348, 2020.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
21. B. P. Wei, L. Castles, and K. A. Stewart, “Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck,”ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 603–605, 2002.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
22. P. K. Bhattacharjee and G. Ghosh, “Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck,”Journal of the Indian Medical Association, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 150-151, 2006.View at:Google Scholar
23. N. J. Qureshi and K. Lakshman, “Laparoscopic excision of cyst of canal of Nuck,”Journal of Minimal Access Surgery, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 87–89, 2014.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
24. A. Pandey, S. Jain, A. Verma, M. Jain, A. Srivastava, and R. C. Shukla, “Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck - rare differential for vulval swelling,”Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 175–177, 2014.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
25. T. Matsumoto, T. Hara, T. Hirashita, N. Kubo, S. Hiroshige, and H. Orita, “Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of a hydrocele of the canal of Nuck extending in the retroperitoneal space: a case report,”International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 861–864, 2014.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
26. U. Topal, A. G. Sarıtaş, A. Ülkü, A. T. Akçam, and F. Doran, “Cyst of the canal of Nuck mimicking inguinal hernia,”International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, vol. 52, pp. 117–119, 2018.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
27. J. W. Lucas, K. C. Shete, C. Schermer, P. Perosio, and S. Sterious, “Canal of Nuck hydrocele in an adult female,”Urology Case Reports, vol. 23, pp. 67-68, 2019.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
28. P. Cervini, J. Mahoney, and L. Wu, “Endometriosis in the canal of Nuck: atypical manifestations in an unusual location,”AJR American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 284-285, 2005.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
29. A. Bagul, S. Jones, S. Dundas, and E. H. Aly, “Endometriosis in the canal of Nuck hydrocele: an unusual presentation,”International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 288-289, 2011.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
30. J. S. Jiménez, P. Barbero, A. Tejerizo, C. Guillén, and C. Strate, “A laparoscopic approach to Nuck's duct endometriosis,”Fertility and Sterility, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. e103–e105, 2011.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
31. K. Okoshi, M. Mizumoto, and K. Kinoshita, “Endometriosis-associated hydrocele of the canal of Nuck with immunohistochemical confirmation: a case report,”Journal of Medical Case Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 354, 2017.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
32. C. J. Wang, A. S. Chao, T. H. Wang, C. T. Wu, A. Chao, and C. H. Lai, “Challenge in the management of endometriosis in the canal of Nuck,”Fertility and Sterility, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 936.e9–936.e11, 2009.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
33. Y. Kanda, “Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics,”Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 452–458, 2013.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar
34. A. N. Visouli, K. Zarogoulidis, I. Kougioumtzi et al., “Catamenial pneumothorax,”Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 6, Supplement 4, pp. S448–S460, 2014.View at:Publisher Site|Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Shunsuke Nagase et al. This is an open access article distributed under theCreative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.