ty -jour a2 -garcía -ortega，eduardo au -achugbu，achugbu，ifeanyi C. au -dudhia，jimy au -olufayo -olufayo，ayorinde A. au -balogun，ifeoluwa a.Au -adefisan -adefisan -adefisan，Elijah A. au -gbode -gbode，Imoleyo e.PY -2020 DA -2020/07/07 TI- WRF地表模型的评估西非SP -6205308 VL -2020 AB-具有四个地表模型（LSMS）的模拟（即Noah，Noah，Noah -MP，Noah -MP，Noah-）MP带有地下水GW选项，CLM4）使用天气研究和预测（WRF）模型在12公里水平网格分辨率下进行，以两组为两套3个月（2011/2012年12月至2012年12月至2012年7月至2012年7月至2012年），在西部进行非洲。目的是评估WRF LSM在模拟西非的气象参数时的性能。在将表面温度与ERA-Interim重新分析数据集进行比较时，对TRMM进行了模型沉淀。结果表明，在不同的土地表面条件下，对于不同变量，LSM的执行方式不同。根据降水量和温度，Noah MP GW总体上是所有变量和季节结合使用的最佳，而Noah则是最后的。具体而言，Noah MP GW最适合JAS温度和降水。CLM4是模拟DJF沉淀的最好的，而Noah是模拟DJF温度的最佳方法。 Noah-MP GW has the wettest Sahel while Noah has the driest one. The strength of the Tropical Easterly Jet (TEJ) is strongest in Noah-MP GW and Noah-MP compared with that in CLM4 and Noah. The core of the African Easterly Jet (AEJ) lies around 12°N in Noah and 15°N for Noah-MP GW. Noah-MP GW and Noah-MP simulations have stronger influx of moisture advection from the southwesterly monsoonal wind than the CLM4 and Noah with Noah showing the least influx. Also, analysis of the evaporative fraction shows sharp gradient for Noah-MP GW and Noah-MP with wetter Sahel further to the north and further to the south for Noah. Noah-MP-GW has the highest amount of soil moisture, while the CLM4 has the least for both the JAS and DJF seasons. The CLM4 has the highest LH for both DJF and JAS seasons but however has the least SH for both DJF and JAS seasons. The principal difference between the LSMs is in the vegetation representation, description, and parameterization of the soil water column; hence, improvement is recommended in this regard. SN - 1687-9309 UR - https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6205308 DO - 10.1155/2020/6205308 JF - Advances in Meteorology PB - Hindawi KW - ER -